| Synopsis
 | The study tests the discursive limits of current models of
the human sensorium.
 | 
| 
 | 
| 
BeginningI (i) - I (vii)
 
 | 
Some preliminary polemics
 
 | 
| Axioms
 0.0 - 0.14
 | Outlines how the eye/ear pair has been mapped onto the 
mind/body dichotomy and how this mapping constructs a passive 
sensorium in which are entrenched anti-intellectual and 
anti-erotic stances. Calls for an examination of the 
dialectical interplay between sensation and cogitation through a re-valuation of 
the role of abstraction in acts of reading and perception.
 
 
 | 
| Prosthetics &
 Proxemics
 1.0 - 1.95
 
 
 | 
 Compares the work of Marshall McLuhan and Walter Benjamin as 
they implicitly engage Jungian psychology. Argues that both 
thinkers approach movement and change in a dichotomous fashion.
 In their texts, the division between the temporal and spatial arts 
stands unmoved. So too, remain unchallenged the sensory biases 
at work in the dyadic models of reproductive politic.
 
 
 | 
| Maieutics
 2.0 - 2.58
 
 
 | Using the anthropological findings of Marilyn Strathern, 
this chapter examines the ethno-scientific
 assumptions that underlay the theories of social and biological reproduction
 developed by Louis Althusser and Mary O'Brien. The one's 
occularcentrism and the other's undertheorizing of the tactile
 inhibit a dialectical understanding of human interaction.
 
 
 | 
| Emulations
 3.0 - 3.48
 
 
 | Concerned with the deployment of sensory organizations 
in theory-making about models themselves, this chapter 
examines Paul Ricoeur's critique of Griemas's generative 
trajectory from the elementary structure of signification
 to narrative structures. Argues that Turing machines and 
models of autopoesis derived from them provide tools for 
avoiding the impasse of precedence that arises in sharp 
distinction between syntax and semantics, distinctions 
rooted in a temporal and spatial classification of the arts.
 
 
 | 
| Dyads & Dialectics
 4.0 - 4.91
 
 
 | Continues to trace the consequences for theory-making 
of sensory organizations: this time from the perspective
 of interpretation. The focus is upon the dichotomist versus 
dialectical epistemologies in feminist thinkers (Susan Bordo, 
Jane Flax, Dorothy Smith and the writing team of Liz Stanley 
and Sue Wise) and in the Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutic of 
appropriation and Roman Ingarden's phenomenological investigation into concretization.
 
 
 | 
| Storing &
Sorting
 5.0 - 5.34
 
 
 | Stakes the claim that models and material practices 
stand in a dialectical relation to each other. Posits 
that non-reductive functional approaches to narrative 
enhance the modelling of an interactive sensorium and 
opens the way for non-trivial analysis of
 narratives coded in other than linguistic means.
 
 
 | 
| Metacommentary
 6.0 - 6.6
 | Recapitulates the progression of the critique of dyads and playful rifts on "body".
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Works Cited
 A - Z
 
 
 | A bibliography
 
 
 | 
| Excursus
 A - W
 
 
 | A florilegium
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Directional Pointers
 |  | 
| More Signals
 | 
 | 
|    copyright © François Lachance  1996
 All Rights Reserved
 lachance@chass.utoronto.ca
 |