Sense of Audience | ||
Scholars should publish in refereed outlets, taking part in a dialogue in the world of ideas, and present a new or interesting approach to a problem to a clearly defined audience in an accessible manner. |
||
In my reading of this brief passage, the quest for novelty is sandwiched between considerations of audience. Starting from the principle of peer review, the scholar is through a dialogue with the world of ideas engaged in a dialogue with the world. It is
telling that the last element listed here is a call for clarity and accessibility. Plowing through the thesis requires the writer to address a
"clearly defined audience in an accessible manner".
Clarity and accessibility are the goal. Sometimes getting there can be circuitous The trick is to translate multiple audiences into writing genres. The writer accumulates and reworks material in a manner similar to Erasmus in De Copia. No opportunity is untapped.
Addressing yourself in the second person is a type of audience cultivation. No one need see you move your lips if your writing to yourself. For more on "self-induced metadiscursive moments" see Sense, 5.32 |
||
Bill of Rights |
|
Bill of Rights |
|
||
copyright 1997 François Lachance |