Synopsis
|
The study tests the discursive limits of current models of
the human sensorium.
|
|
Beginning
I (i) - I (vii)
|
Some preliminary polemics
|
Axioms 0.0 - 0.14
|
Outlines how the eye/ear pair has been mapped onto the
mind/body dichotomy and how this mapping constructs a passive
sensorium in which are entrenched anti-intellectual and
anti-erotic stances. Calls for an examination of the
dialectical interplay between sensation and cogitation through a re-valuation of
the role of abstraction in acts of reading and perception.
|
Prosthetics &
Proxemics
1.0 - 1.95
|
Compares the work of Marshall McLuhan and Walter Benjamin as
they implicitly engage Jungian psychology. Argues that both
thinkers approach movement and change in a dichotomous fashion.
In their texts, the division between the temporal and spatial arts
stands unmoved. So too, remain unchallenged the sensory biases
at work in the dyadic models of reproductive politic.
|
Maieutics
2.0 - 2.58
|
Using the anthropological findings of Marilyn Strathern,
this chapter examines the ethno-scientific
assumptions that underlay the theories of social and biological reproduction
developed by Louis Althusser and Mary O'Brien. The one's
occularcentrism and the other's undertheorizing of the tactile
inhibit a dialectical understanding of human interaction.
|
Emulations
3.0 - 3.48
|
Concerned with the deployment of sensory organizations
in theory-making about models themselves, this chapter
examines Paul Ricoeur's critique of Griemas's generative
trajectory from the elementary structure of signification
to narrative structures. Argues that Turing machines and
models of autopoesis derived from them provide tools for
avoiding the impasse of precedence that arises in sharp
distinction between syntax and semantics, distinctions
rooted in a temporal and spatial classification of the arts.
|
Dyads & Dialectics
4.0 - 4.91
|
Continues to trace the consequences for theory-making
of sensory organizations: this time from the perspective
of interpretation. The focus is upon the dichotomist versus
dialectical epistemologies in feminist thinkers (Susan Bordo,
Jane Flax, Dorothy Smith and the writing team of Liz Stanley
and Sue Wise) and in the Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutic of
appropriation and Roman Ingarden's phenomenological investigation into concretization.
|
Storing &
Sorting
5.0 - 5.34
|
Stakes the claim that models and material practices
stand in a dialectical relation to each other. Posits
that non-reductive functional approaches to narrative
enhance the modelling of an interactive sensorium and
opens the way for non-trivial analysis of
narratives coded in other than linguistic means.
|
Metacommentary
6.0 - 6.6
|
Recapitulates the progression of the critique of dyads and playful rifts on "body".
|
|
Works Cited
A - Z
|
A bibliography
|
Excursus
A - W
|
A florilegium
|
|
Directional Pointers
|
|
More Signals
|
|
copyright © François Lachance 1996
All Rights Reserved
lachance@chass.utoronto.ca
|